Inference rules: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami
| Linia 1: | Linia 1: | ||
== Inference rules of algorithmic logic == | == Inference rules of algorithmic logic == | ||
| − | <span style="color: Blue"><math> | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>|{R_1\}\qquad\dfrac{\alpha ,(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{\beta } </math></span> |
| − | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_2\}\qquad \dfrac{(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{(K\alpha \Rightarrow K\beta )} </math></span> | |
| − | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_3\}\qquad \dfrac{\{s({\bf if}\ \gamma \ {\bf then}\ K\ {\bf fi})^{i}(\lnot | |
\gamma \wedge \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta \}_{i\in N}}{(s({\bf while}\ | \gamma \wedge \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta \}_{i\in N}}{(s({\bf while}\ | ||
| − | \gamma \ {\bf do}\ K\ {\bf od}\ \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta )} </ | + | \gamma \ {\bf do}\ K\ {\bf od}\ \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta )} </math></span> |
| − | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_4\}\qquad \dfrac{\{(K^i\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )\}_{i\in N}}{(\bigcup | |
| − | K\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )} </ | + | K\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )} </math></span> |
| − | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_5\}\qquad \dfrac{\{(\alpha \Longrightarrow K^i\beta )\}_{i\in N}}{(\alpha | |
| − | \Longrightarrow \bigcap K\beta )} </ | + | \Longrightarrow \bigcap K\beta )} </math></span> |
| − | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_6\}\qquad \dfrac{(\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )}{((\exists | |
| − | x)\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )} </ | + | x)\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )} </math></span> |
| − | + | <span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_7\}\qquad \dfrac{(\beta ~\Longrightarrow ~\alpha (x))}{(\beta | |
| − | \Longrightarrow (\forall )\alpha (x))} </ | + | \Longrightarrow (\forall )\alpha (x))} </math></span> |
Wersja z 09:58, 19 lis 2015
Inference rules of algorithmic logic
[math]|{R_1\}\qquad\dfrac{\alpha ,(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{\beta } [/math] [math]\{R_2\}\qquad \dfrac{(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{(K\alpha \Rightarrow K\beta )} [/math] [math]\{R_3\}\qquad \dfrac{\{s({\bf if}\ \gamma \ {\bf then}\ K\ {\bf fi})^{i}(\lnot \gamma \wedge \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta \}_{i\in N}}{(s({\bf while}\ \gamma \ {\bf do}\ K\ {\bf od}\ \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta )} [/math] [math]\{R_4\}\qquad \dfrac{\{(K^i\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )\}_{i\in N}}{(\bigcup K\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )} [/math] [math]\{R_5\}\qquad \dfrac{\{(\alpha \Longrightarrow K^i\beta )\}_{i\in N}}{(\alpha \Longrightarrow \bigcap K\beta )} [/math] [math]\{R_6\}\qquad \dfrac{(\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )}{((\exists x)\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )} [/math] [math]\{R_7\}\qquad \dfrac{(\beta ~\Longrightarrow ~\alpha (x))}{(\beta \Longrightarrow (\forall )\alpha (x))} [/math]
In rules $R_6$ and $R_7$, it is assumed that $x$ is a variable which is not free in $
\beta $, i.e. $x \notin FV(\beta )$. The rules are known as the rule for
introducing an existential quantifier into the antecedent of an implication
and the rule for introducing a universal quantifier into the suc\-ces\-sor
of an implication. The rules $R_4$ and $R_5$ are algorithmic counterparts of rules
$R_6$ and $R_7$. They are of a different character, however, since their sets of
premises are in\-finite. The rule $R_3$ for introducing a \textbf{while} into the
antecedent of an implicationis of a similar nature. These three rules are
called $\omega $-rules.
The rule $R_{1}$ is known as \textit{modus ponens}, or the \textit{cut} rule.
In all the above schemes of axioms and inference rules, $\alpha $, $\beta $, $\delta $ are arbi\-trary for\-mulas, $\gamma $ and $\gamma ^{\prime }$ are arbitrary open formulas, $\tau $ is an arbitrary term, $s$ is a finite se\-quence of assignment instructions, and $K$ and $M$ are arbitrary programs.
