Inference rules: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Lem
Skocz do: nawigacji, wyszukiwania
Linia 1: Linia 1:
== Inference rules of algorithmic logic ==
+
There are seven basic inference rules and much more secondary rules
 +
== Basic inference rules of algorithmic logic ==
  
 
<span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_1\}\qquad\dfrac{\alpha ,(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{\beta }  </math></span>
 
<span style="color: Blue"><math>\{R_1\}\qquad\dfrac{\alpha ,(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{\beta }  </math></span>
Linia 22: Linia 23:
  
  
In rules $R_6$ and $R_7$, it is assumed that $x$ is a variable which is not free in $
+
In rules <math>R_6</math> and <math>R_7</math>, it is assumed that <math>x</math> is a variable which is not free in <math>
\beta $, i.e. $x \notin  FV(\beta )$. The rules are known as the rule for
+
\beta </math>, i.e. <math>x \notin  FV(\beta )</math>. The rules are known as the rule for
 
introducing an existential quantifier into the antecedent of an implication
 
introducing an existential quantifier into the antecedent of an implication
 
and the rule for introducing a universal quantifier into the suc\-ces\-sor
 
and the rule for introducing a universal quantifier into the suc\-ces\-sor
of an implication. The rules $R_4$ and $R_5$ are algorithmic counterparts of rules
+
of an implication. The rules <math>R_4</math> and <math>R_5</math> are algorithmic counterparts of rules
$R_6$ and $R_7$. They are of a different character, however, since their sets of
+
<math>R_6</math> and <math>R_7</math>. They are of a different character, however, since their sets of
premises are in\-finite. The rule $R_3$ for introducing a \textbf{while} into the
+
premises are in\-finite. The rule <math>R_3</math> for introducing a \textbf{while} into the
 
antecedent of an implicationis of a similar nature. These three rules are
 
antecedent of an implicationis of a similar nature. These three rules are
called $\omega $-rules.
+
called <math>\omega</math>$-rules.
  
The rule $R_{1}$ is known as \textit{modus ponens}, or the \textit{cut} rule.
+
The rule <math>R_{1}</math> is known as \textit{modus ponens}, or the \textit{cut} rule.
  
In all the above schemes of axioms and inference rules, $\alpha $, $\beta $,  
+
In all the above schemes of axioms and inference rules, <math>\alpha </math>, <math>\beta </math>,  
$\delta $ are arbi\-trary for\-mulas, $\gamma $ and $\gamma ^{\prime }$ are
+
<math>\delta </math> are arbi\-trary for\-mulas, <math>\gamma </math> and <math>\gamma ^{\prime }</math> are
arbitrary open formulas, $\tau $ is an arbitrary term, $s$ is a finite
+
arbitrary open formulas, <math>\tau </math> is an arbitrary term, <math>s</math> is a finite
se\-quence of assignment instructions, and $K$ and $M$ are arbitrary
+
se\-quence of assignment instructions, and <math>K</math> and <math>M</math> are arbitrary
 
programs.
 
programs.

Wersja z 11:08, 19 lis 2015

There are seven basic inference rules and much more secondary rules

Basic inference rules of algorithmic logic

[math]\{R_1\}\qquad\dfrac{\alpha ,(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{\beta } [/math]

[math]\{R_2\}\qquad \dfrac{(\alpha \Rightarrow \beta )}{(K\alpha \Rightarrow K\beta )} [/math]

[math]\{R_3\}\qquad \dfrac{\{s({\bf if}\ \gamma \ {\bf then}\ K\ {\bf fi})^{i}(\lnot \gamma \wedge \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta \}_{i\in N}}{(s({\bf while}\ \gamma \ {\bf do}\ K\ {\bf od}\ \alpha )\Longrightarrow \beta )} [/math]

[math]\{R_4\}\qquad \dfrac{\{(K^i\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )\}_{i\in N}}{(\bigcup K\alpha \Longrightarrow \beta )} [/math]

[math]\{R_5\}\qquad \dfrac{\{(\alpha \Longrightarrow K^i\beta )\}_{i\in N}}{(\alpha \Longrightarrow \bigcap K\beta )} [/math]

[math]\{R_6\}\qquad \dfrac{(\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )}{((\exists x)\alpha (x)~\Longrightarrow ~\beta )} [/math]

[math]\{R_7\}\qquad \dfrac{(\beta ~\Longrightarrow ~\alpha (x))}{(\beta \Longrightarrow (\forall )\alpha (x))} [/math]


In rules [math]R_6[/math] and [math]R_7[/math], it is assumed that [math]x[/math] is a variable which is not free in [math] \beta [/math], i.e. [math]x \notin FV(\beta )[/math]. The rules are known as the rule for introducing an existential quantifier into the antecedent of an implication and the rule for introducing a universal quantifier into the suc\-ces\-sor of an implication. The rules [math]R_4[/math] and [math]R_5[/math] are algorithmic counterparts of rules [math]R_6[/math] and [math]R_7[/math]. They are of a different character, however, since their sets of premises are in\-finite. The rule [math]R_3[/math] for introducing a \textbf{while} into the antecedent of an implicationis of a similar nature. These three rules are called [math]\omega[/math]$-rules.

The rule [math]R_{1}[/math] is known as \textit{modus ponens}, or the \textit{cut} rule.

In all the above schemes of axioms and inference rules, [math]\alpha [/math], [math]\beta [/math], [math]\delta [/math] are arbi\-trary for\-mulas, [math]\gamma [/math] and [math]\gamma ^{\prime }[/math] are arbitrary open formulas, [math]\tau [/math] is an arbitrary term, [math]s[/math] is a finite se\-quence of assignment instructions, and [math]K[/math] and [math]M[/math] are arbitrary programs.